Disease within " the sieze within " of M J Akbar
what is common between M F Hussain , M Mushirul Hasan , M J Akbar ? the alphabetical similarty between the initial of their names sounds excellent from children. they share a common relgion is an absurd answer in these forced pseudosecularism. the only appreciable common nature between them is their " anti hindu " element in their absurd art. first one has mastered a painting art that looks like traces of a cockroach crawling on a canvas just after coming out an inkpot. second one's imagination becomes history and the third one is a man who writes untruthful and baseless articles to fill up remaining spaces of dailies. provided the anti hindu element of their works would be absent from scene they would be present at traffic signals of Delhi with their co-religious chaps chanting " allah ke naam par de de beba ."
the most recent joke akbar has presented us , is his article " bjp needs to convince young, hindu women " in his column " the sieze within " at times of india editorial , june 06 , 2010.
right now i am doing " ungli " at my gorgeous keyboard only to deposit a cyber slap at the cheek of that takla chap.
the article aimed to conclude that bjp is ambitious of a male dominating society and that hindu girls have no respect towards hinduism. he starts with saying that bjp's historic flaw is its "misconception" that mnorities want secularism and not the majority.
not at all , bjp knows the truth that the fate of a nation is decided by the majority and not the minority. its the majority who developped the sence of secularism , minority just wants a pseudosecularsm for its own selfish benefits. what they want is a state that will dominate hindu beliefs and sponsor muslim fanaticism. the fact that muslim wants a secular state gets triumphed when prepoll coverages show imams commanding the muslim mass to press the evm buttuns as par his instruction and when postpoll results come out, the obedience of miuslim mass towards their maulana gets certified. the "secular " aspect of our country gets properly exposed when the imam of delhi, patronized by so called secular parties announces in an openconference , " its most necessery to use india's secular political groups to convert it into dar-ul-islam ".
akbar goes on justifying the "scular" nature of the uslims - " the indian muslims do have a vested interest in secularism seice it ensures equality and democratic power. but its less than half a story ."
their vested interest is a lot henious and chauvinistic because whenver muslims are in majority they gangbang the word " secularism ". who has given birth to pakistan and bangladesh ? can our great seculars mention a single secular state with muslim majority ?
now my secular readers will bark -" he has talked about indian muslims ."
really ? then just lend me an ear.
KASHMIR - 4 AKH HINDUS REFUGEE IN THEIR OWN HOMELAND DUE TO " LOVE " FROM THEIR MUSLIM NEIGHBOURS.
KERALA - REGULAR ATTACK ON INNNOCENT HINDUS BY MUSLIM FANATICS.
BIHAR - KISHENGANJ DISTRICT ITH A MUSLIM MAJORITY AND POPULATION 60 LAKH BANGLA INFILTRATORS , BANNED HINDU FESTIVALS AND ATTACK HINDUS FREQUENTLY.
ASSAM - MUSLIM MAJORTY AREAS UNSAFE FOR HINDUS.
BENGAL - BORDER AREAS' MUSLIM FOLLOWING HERIDITARY ANTI HINDU RIOTS. MOST RECENT IS DEGANGA RIOTS. RIGHT TODAY
and when they are overall minority on an average , they want a special type of secularism that ensures :- MUSLIM STUDENT BELONGING TO A FAMILY EARNING RS.38,000/- P/M WILL HAVE A RESERVATION AND HINDUS' SEATS WILL BE MINIMIZED , NO MERCY DROP WILL FALL ON A BPL HINDU STUDENT.
THE TORTURED KASHMIRI HINDUS AT REFUGE NEED TO BUY RICE @ RS.40/- PER KG AND A KASHMIRI MUSLIM WHO TORTURED THAT INNOCENT HINDU WILL ENJOY THE SAME AMOUNT @RS.1/-
IN A SECULAR NATION HINDUS WILL PAY PILGRIMAGE TAX AND A MUSLIM WILL RECEIVE SUBSIDY OF RS.26,000/- FROM GOVT FOR HAJ IN MECCA.
A HINDU HAVING AN EXTRA WIFE WILL BE ARRESTED BY A MUSLIM POLICEMAN HAVING TWO WIVES , CHARGESHEETED BY A MUSLIM LAWYER WITH THREE WIVES , PENALIZED BY A MUSLIM JUDGE ABEDING FOUR "LEGAL" WIVES AND FINALLY THE REPORT WILL BE PUBLISHED BY A MUSLIM JOURNALIST ENJOYING SERVICES OF NUMERAL SEX-SLAVES.
many more such vested interest can be fulfilled only in this special type of secularism that can be uniquely founf in our " INCREDIBLE INDIA ".
akbar repeats , " India is secular not because Muslims need it, but because Hindus want it. "
but hindus never wanted a pseudosecularism that goes on in india and worshipped by biased media , exploiter politicians and "_________" muslims. ( fill up the blank with prpper adjective . homework lrft for you. )
he furthur adds , " There is nothing new about it. The Hindu Mahasabha did not win a single Hindu seat in 1937, even in an age of separate electorates, and did not do much better in 1946 despite the fact that Muslim League swept the Muslim seats in an environment darkened by raging communal storms."
now one thing is to be noted that hindus never wanted radicalism that they thaught to be contained within the hindu mahasabha because they never properly understood its charter and policies. so it lost . on the contrary public should notice how much dirty , dark and henious is the muslim mass and what is its tendency that was reflected when they elected muslim leauge. akbar has perhaps forgot to take permission of joya chatterjee , ag noorani and others who blame the partition to be the result of communalism of hindu mahasabha .
thanks for such a mistake.
just think , those time hindus mistrusted hindu mahasabha and the result is in front of us .
MIND THAT " HISTORY REPEATS ITSELF TRIGONOMETRICALLY."
now akbar comes the women folk , his favouriute strategy to falsely malign hindus. he writes :- " The new Indian woman is all around us, seeking a place on a college campus, en route to the workplace; participating in television as activist, audience and artiste; on the sports field; on the street; she is everywhere you look — most of all, at home.
The revolution is not limited to the urban rich. A week ago we were forced, by that inedible curse called the traffic jam, to take a secondary road through villages from Dehradun airport to the academy in Mussoorie. Women, compelled by circumstance and male prejudice, were carrying large utensils of water on their head from source to home. The younger women were in jeans, or some variation of it. Women everywhere share the common aspiration for modernity and economic success.
The more ardent flag-wavers have missed this pervasive and continuing emancipation, which started tentatively in the 1980s but has acquired an unstoppable momentum now. There is change wherever the eye falls, in whatever the senses pick up: dress, public icons, shifting sexual mores — and examination results, where women are asserting their will to be future leaders. The new Indian woman has claimed the mantle of independence as the means of empowerment. She wants freedom, to choose, at a life-changing level; career above marriage if she so desires; or, at an incidental level, a pub over the confines of home. She is demanding the prerogatives of men.
Cinema, that persistent barometer of behaviour, has long abandoned the image of a sati savitri naari at the feet of her pati parmeshwar. The new Indian woman is increasingly contemptuous of any cage, gilded with gold or paste, in the name of tradition or any spurious ism. She barely bothers to hide her contempt. Fear, or trepidation, might make her hesitate occasionally, but this is a circumstantial restraint. Check her inner will.
One is not suggesting that this is true of everyone; but this is the role model that is influencing attitudes of decisive numbers. You cannot chase this generation out of a pub without sending a nationwide signal advertising your gender bias. The girls in the Mangalore pub did not go to drink senselessly; they went there to exercise the right to go there. Those who attacked the pub, incidentally, had the full support of conservative reactionaries from all religions. While reactionary politics might persist among some ethnic groups, it is becoming malodorous to the young. Religion remains an important aspect of Indian life; the Hindu young celebrate Durga Puja, Holi and Diwali with as much joy as their elders. But their faith, regrettable exceptions apart, is socially inclusive, not aggressively exclusive.
As India becomes an increasingly younger country, it is this culture that will tip power towards one party or another. If the BJP cannot get the vote of the young, modern Hindu woman, it has no future."
first of all akbar should have an eye surgery to ensure that his balls are working properly. if the "jeans" is the only sign of liberalism then he must look the fact that even the daughter of extreme RSS , BAJRANG DAL , HINDU SAMHATI operatives wear jeans as well as their wives and sisters . where jeans is meaningless is the muslim society where there are several groups such as JAMAT ISLAMI , MIM , POPULAR FRONT OF INDIA which has so much interest to ban jeans among muslim girls and ensure that they are hidden under BURQUA . the deja vu is that even the most pro-jeans liberalists are rationalizing the BURQUA . strange hypocricy!!!
well those muslim groups are now constantly taking on RSS to side some young hindus seeking space at cyber media with a facebook accounts and sometime photpgenic profiles , but not always . the muslims are great , they are so much commited to ensure liberalism in hindus and hell bent to darken and hide the muslims !!!!!! similar greatness can be founf is mj akbar and his colligues.
its the muslims where women expolitaion is found at greatest extent , but they dont get any scope from our " courageous media " to space their voice.
its the deoband to issue several fatwas from ban of video camera at marriage ceremony to women going to workplace . hindus always go to work , none prohibits. my mother herself is a corporation official , and she belongs to a family that breeds firy hinduists.
now come to the mangalore pub case . mj akbar didn't found is wrong that some girls were mistakenly hurt , that is condemned by several hindutva groups. his advocacy is that drinking is their right . strange !!! i agree muthalik's method was wrong but just tell when these drunken girls are victims , do akbar or lke people have any answer? news reports and pople's experience is eye witness that numeral girls are sexually expolited at their drunken state and the expoliters use the video clip for future crimes . many a cases resulted out to be a commitment to scucide. then no column can help , neither of akbar , nor mine . but think what would be the effect of muthalik's view ? i leave to my those readers who have a younh daughter or a sister that does not want to be any of the followig :- slut , blackmailed sex slave or a suicder .
and about sati savitri !!!!!!!
they were holy ladies and were devoted wife , not at the feet of ther pati parameshwar , but their " SAHADHARMINI " or better half or partner. the respect that hindu wives get , how many muslim wives can claim the same ?
actually , the main cause behind akbar's such statement is his genetical heritage . go back to MOHAMMED'S age . he forced his all 14 wives to abed with him . he forcefully got his daughter-in-law divorced and married her . a nine years old girl AYESHA was forced to warm his bed because he loved little girls . though i am not a linguist , but can pretty conclude that the word AYYASHI came from AYESHA , guilt is not of her , but of him. just manage to get a copy of SATANIC VERSES by SALMAN RUSHDIE .
and about the bollywood women ? then i must say they must not be counted in an article eanrt to be read by common people. a bollywood actress without marriage biologically embraced 7 people till now , in KAMLA MARKET of DELHI or SONAGACHI of KOLKATA she would be called a harlot and in your locality she would be praised as a CHARECTERLESS
but in bollywood she is called a DIVA .
so now i leave it upto my readers how much logical is the linking of cinema here ?
I WILL NOT SAY WHO SHOULD CONVINCE WHOM , BUT I INSIST AKBAR TO CONVINCE HIS MIRROR IAGE .
------------- SAFFRON TRIDENT TITU